ReviewArchives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases2025
Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and liver disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although previous meta-analyses have explored the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) compared to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AFib) and liver disease, recent studies and emerging data necessitate a re-evaluation of the topic. Therefore, we conducted an updated meta-analysis to incorporate the latest evidence and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the literature. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of DOAC in patients diagnosed with AFib and liver disease. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, this meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO (2024 CRD42024584964). A detailed search up to August 2024 was conducted for the studies comparing DOAC with warfarin. The quality of the included observational studies was evaluated using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Results: This meta-analysis included 53,224 participants with AFib and liver disease. The use of DOAC, in comparison to warfarin, was significantly linked to a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.60-0.98; Conclusions: Recent studies indicate that DOAC are at least non-inferior to warfarin concerning efficacy and safety of patients with AFib and liver disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.