ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2025
Emerging Trends in the Application of Nanosuspension-Based Biomaterials for Anticancer Drug Delivery.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Redefining long-acting injectables: the emerging role of extracellular vesicles in sustained drug delivery.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Review
- Self-Assembled Gefitinib Nanosuspension Prepared via Hummer Acoustic Resonance Technology: Enhanced Dissolution, In Vitro Anticancer Activity and Long-Term Stability.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The treatment of cancer remains a formidable challenge, largely due to the difficulty in achieving efficient co-delivery of chemotherapeutic and immunotherapeutic agents to specific tumor sites. Nanosuspension-based biomaterial drug delivery systems for anti-cancer (NBDDSC) have emerged as promising platforms for enhancing drug solubility, stability, and targeted delivery. These systems can be categorized into natural polymer-based, synthetic polymer-based, and hybrid nanosuspensions, each offering distinct advantages in biocompatibility, drug loading, and controlled release. However, the majority of existing NBDDSC rely on synthetic materials that function primarily as excipients, offering no intrinsic therapeutic value. These materials often require intricate manufacturing processes, which can result in issues with batch consistency, reduced stability, and diminished therapeutic efficacy. Additionally, the potential side effects associated with synthetic components further underscore the limitations of these systems. This review explores various preparation methods for nanosuspensions, including antisolvent precipitation, high pressure homogenization, and ultrasonication, highlighting their impact on particle size, drug encapsulation, and stability. Furthermore, the targeted applications of these nanosuspensions in treating of cancers such as glioma is discussed to emphasize their potential clinical relevance. By addressing current limitations, this review underscores the critical importance of simpler, safer, and clinically translatable NBDDSC in advancing cancer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.