ReviewMaternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)2025
Artificial Intelligence and Postpartum Hemorrhage.
Review in Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Racial Disparities and the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Maternal Mortality: A Literature Review.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Ultrasound texture-based radiomics of placental and myometrial tissue for predicting postpartum blood loss in women with placenta previa and low-lying placenta.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Evolving perspectives on blood transfusion in obstetric hemorrhage: a narrative review.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) remains a significant contributor to maternal mortality and morbidity worldwide, with approximately 14 million women affected annually and 70,000 resulting deaths. Despite advances in health care, PPH continues to pose challenges even in developed settings. Apart from mortality, PPH leads to various adverse outcomes and morbidity. Recently, there has been a surge in interest in using artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning and deep learning, across many areas of health care. This article explores the application of AI in tackling PPH, including predictive modeling and risk stratification. Some studies have shown promising results in predicting PPH. However, external validation of these models is crucial and frequently lacking, with barriers including differences in cohort characteristics and variations in outcome measurement methods. Most of the existing research has taken place in well-resourced health care settings, and there is a lack of models applicable to resource-limited settings where the need is arguably greatest. Incorporating uterine contractility metrics and radiomics into predictive models offers new avenues for enhancing prediction accuracy. Beyond risk prediction, AI has also been explored in other aspects of PPH management, including blood product management and early detection using wearable devices. In conclusion, while AI presents exciting opportunities for PPH prediction and management, challenges such as model validation, clinical translation, and applicability in diverse health care settings remain. Further research, particularly in low-and middle-income countries, is necessary to realize the full potential of AI for addressing the global burden of PPH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.