Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40620611›Full record

ReviewEClinicalMedicine2025

Patient

Carolyn G Mazariego, Sandra Avery, Geoffrey P Delaney, Joanna E Fardell, Susan Hayes, Darren Haywood, Julia Lai-Kwon, Sandra Nolte, Joanne Pearson, Natasha A Roberts and 4 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Patient-reported outcomes and measures applied in individuals undergoing colonoscopy surveillance for colorectal cancer: a scoping review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Carolyn G MazariegoImplementation to Impact (i2i), School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sandra AverySouth Western Sydney Local Health District, NSW, Australia.
Geoffrey P DelaneySouth Western Sydney Local Health District, NSW, Australia.
Joanna E FardellBehavioural Sciences Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Susan HayesCOSA PRO Working Group Consumer Advocate, WA, Australia.
Darren HaywoodHuman Performance Research Centre, INSIGHT Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Driver Avenue, Moore Park, Sydney, NSW, 2021, Australia.
Julia Lai-KwonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, VIC, Australia.
Sandra NoltePerson-Centred Research, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, VIC, Australia.
Joanne PearsonSouth Western Sydney Local Health District, NSW, Australia.
Natasha A RobertsSTARS Education and Research Alliance, Metro North Health, QLD, Australia.
Christina SignorelliBehavioural Sciences Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Natalie TaylorImplementation to Impact (i2i), School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Kate WebberSchool of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, VIC, Australia.
Bogda KoczwaraFlinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This viewpoint reports on the outcomes of the 2023 Australian interest holder meeting on the use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in cancer care and discusses its findings in the context of the significant national investment into the collection of PRO data in Australia. The interest holders emphasised the importance for PRO data collection to be relevant to the care of individual patients and personalised to their needs and preferences to ensure direct impact on patients' care and outcomes. They also prioritised the coordination and integration of various PRO collection efforts to improve patient outcomes

Indexed as

Cancer careDigital healthPatient centred carePatient-reported outcomes

Identifiers

PMID40620611
PMCPMC12226390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.