ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Evaluating axillary lymph node metastasis risks in breast cancer patients via Semi-ALNP: a multicenter study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a pathomics-driven machine learning model for individualized prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and early recurrence in HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Multi-parametric MRI habitat radiomics with interpretable machine learning for early prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for prediction of occult lymph node metastasis in clinical stage T1 lung adenocarcinoma.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurately evaluating axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) is essential for guiding both staging and treatment strategies in breast cancer (BC) patients. Currently, traditional pathological staging methods still rely on invasive biopsies or surgeries. This study aimed to construct, evaluate, and validate a semisupervised classifier utilizing radiomic and machine learning (ML) techniques to noninvasively identify axillary nodal disease. Methods: Data from 4191 ALNs in 494 patients with invasive BC were retrospectively analyzed at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University between January 31, 2016, and July 31, 2024, including a labeled cohort (214 patients, 1769 ALNs, divided into ultra-low and ultra-high risk groups) and an unlabeled cohort (280 patients, 2422 ALNs). Regions of interest (ROIs) were segmented, and CT radiomic features were extracted. 11 supervised learning models were built on the basis of labeled ALNs, and pseudolabels (low-risk, high-risk groups) were assigned to unlabeled ALNs. Seven ML algorithms developed semisupervised multiclassifiers on the basis of the predicted probabilities for 4191 ALNs. For multicenter validation, additional data were collected from the First People's Hospital of Chenzhou City, the First People's Hospital of Changde City, and the First People's Hospital of Xiangtan City. The best-performing multiclassifier was evaluated in two independent multicenter cohorts: 212 clinically node-positive (cN+) patients who underwent core needle biopsy (CNB) or fine needle aspiration (FNA), and 450 clinically node-negative (cN0) patients. The research was registered at www.isrctn.com with registration number ISRCTN54288903. Findings: The supervised multilayer perceptron (MLP) model, built from labeled ALNs, exhibited excellent classification performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.959 (95% CI: 0.937-0.981), a sensitivity of 0.899, and a specificity of 0.932. Pseudolabels for the unlabeled ALNs were generated via this model, and the semisupervised MLP multiclassifier (Semi-ALNP) was constructed by combining the labeled and unlabeled data. The AUCs for predicting nodal metastases were 0.906 (95% CI: 0.894-0.917), 0.936 (95% CI: 0.928-0.945), 0.948 (95% CI: 0.940-0.956), and 0.955 (95% CI: 0.946-0.965) for the ultra-low risk, low-risk, high-risk, and ultra-high risk groups, respectively. Validation in both the biopsy and cN0 cohorts revealed strong diagnostic performance: in the biopsy cohort, the model achieved a false negative rate (FNR) of 1.21%, a false positive rate (FPR) of 14.89%, a sensitivity of 98.79%, and a specificity of 85.11%; in the cN0 cohort, the FNR was 8.33%, the FPR was 9.94%, the sensitivity was 91.67%, and the specificity was 90.06%. Interpretation: Semi-ALNP, which is based on the MLP algorithm, has high accuracy in assessing the statuses of ALNs across all types of BC patients. It is particularly effective for identifying high-risk patients with ALN metastasis, which can help guide personalized treatment decisions. Future prospective studies are planned to further validate the clinical utility of this approach in real-world settings. Funding: This study was funded by the Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province (Grant No. 2021SK2026) and the Innovation Platform and Talent Plan of Hunan Province (2023SK4019). Funding sources were not involved in the study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation, writing of the report, or decision to submit the article for publication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.