Trial reportFrontiers in public health2025
Evaluating the impact of standardized hospital medical administration on doctor-patient relationships and clinical efficiency in emergency care: a controlled study.
Trial report in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The patient-doctor relationship questionnaire (PDRQ-9). An overview of 20 years of research and a proposal for normalisation of scores. Systematic review.Frontiers in health services · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Standardized management in hospital administration aims to optimize efficiency and doctor-patient relationships through structured workflows. However, empirical evidence of its impact in emergency care settings remains limited. Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial with 128 emergency patients at a tertiary hospital (January-June 2023). Participants were allocated to either routine management (Control Group, CG) or standardized management (Observation Group, OG). Outcomes included dispute incidence, satisfaction scores, and operational metrics. Participants were randomly assigned via computer-generated block randomization (1:1 ratio, stratified by age and sex) using SPSS 23.0. Primary data were collected using the validated Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ-15), custom satisfaction surveys (Cronbach's Results: The OG demonstrated significantly higher scores in patient education (disease knowledge: 48.21 vs. 28.38, Conclusion: Standardized medical administration significantly improved emergency care outcomes, reducing disputes by 78% (3.13% vs. 14.06%) and increasing satisfaction to 96.88%. We recommend: (1) mandatory staff training in these protocols, (2) monthly monitoring using our validated tools, and (3) dedicated quality teams to sustain improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.