Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40620558›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Utilising artificial intelligence in prehospital emergency care systems in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.

Odhran Mallon, Freddy Lippert, Willem Stassen, Marcus Eng Hock Ong, Caitlin Dolkart, Thomas Krafft, Eva Pilot

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Odhran MallonFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Freddy LippertFalck, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Willem StassenDivision of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Marcus Eng Hock OngDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Caitlin DolkartRescue.co, Nairobi, Kenya.
Thomas KrafftFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Eva PilotFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Improvements in prehospital emergency care have the potential to transform patient outcomes globally, but particularly within low-and middle-income countries. Whilst artificial intelligence is being implemented in many healthcare settings, little is known about its use in prehospital emergency care systems. This scoping review aims to uncover how artificial intelligence is currently being used within the prehospital emergency medical services of low-and middle-income countries and assess the implications for future development. Methods: A review of peer-reviewed articles using any artificial intelligence models in prehospital emergency care in low-and middle-income countries was carried out. Medline, Global Health, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science were searched for studies published between January 2014 and July 2024. Data were extracted, collated and presented in table format and as a narrative synthesis. This scoping review is reported using the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Results: Sixteen articles were included in the study. Most studies were conducted in China and deep learning models were used in half of the studies. Articles assessing dispatch forecasting were the most common, although artificial intelligence tools are also utilised in classification and disease prediction. There was significant variation in sample sizes throughout the selected studies. Overall, machine learning algorithms outperformed other comparator methods when they were used in all but two studies. Discussion: Limitations included only analysing articles published in English. Additionally, studies that did not identify the model as an artificial intelligence tool, or did not explicitly mention a LMIC in the title or abstract may have been inadvertently excluded. Whilst artificial intelligence can significantly benefit patient care in out-of-hospital settings, the continued development of this technology requires proper consideration for the local sociocultural contexts and challenges in these countries, along with using complete, population-specific datasets. Further research is needed to support advancements in this field and promote the realisation of universal health coverage. Systematic review registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/9VS2M, osf.io/9vs2m.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeveloping CountriesEmergency Medical ServicesHumansartificial intelligenceemergency medical servicesemergency patient careLMICmachine learningprehospital

Identifiers

PMID40620558
PMCPMC12226592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.