Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40620557›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025

Sentiment analysis in public health: a systematic review of the current state, challenges, and future directions.

Ismael Villanueva-Miranda, Yang Xie, Guanghua Xiao

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ismael Villanueva-MirandaDepartment of Health Data Science and Biostatistics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
Yang XieDepartment of Health Data Science and Biostatistics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
Guanghua XiaoDepartment of Health Data Science and Biostatistics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.

Funding

Developing novel algorithms for spatial molecular profiling technologiesR01GM141519 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI XIAO, GUANGHUA · 2021 to 2024
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM141519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Sentiment analysis, using natural language processing to understand opinions in text, is increasingly relevant for public health given the volume of online health discussions. Effectively using this approach requires understanding its methods, applications, and limitations. This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of sentiment analysis in public health, examining methodologies, applications, data sources, challenges, evaluation practices, and ethical considerations. Methods: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, searching academic databases through Semantic Scholar and screening studies for relevance. A total of 83 papers analyzing the use of sentiment analysis in public health contexts were included. Results: The review identified a trend toward the use of advanced deep learning methods and large language models (LLMs) for a wide range of public health applications. However, challenges remain, particularly related to interpretability and resource demands. Social media is the predominant data source, which raises concerns about data quality, bias, linguistic complexity, and ethical issues. Discussion: Sentiment analysis offers the potential for gaining public health insights but faces significant methodological, data-related, and ethical challenges. Reliable and ethical application demands rigorous validation, improved model interpretability, the development of ethical frameworks, and continued research to support responsible development and deployment.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingPublic HealthDeep LearningHumansSocial MediaLLMmental healthnatural language processingpublic healthsentiment analysissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40620557
PMCPMC12226299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.