Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40620534›Full record

ArticleWomen & therapy2025

Recognizing and Challenging Size Privilege: A Primer for Mental Health Clinicians and Researchers.

Caitlin A Martin-Wagar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Caitlin A Martin-WagarDepartment of Psychology, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4284-9777

Funding

Wildfires and Cardiovascular Health: Evaluating Associations and Intervention StrategiesP20GM130418 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA · PI Ethan Sheppard Walker · 2020 to 2026
$17.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the prevalence of higher-weight people and the adverse outcomes associated with weight stigma, body size is a necessary component of multicultural training. However, body size has not routinely been included in identity-based prejudice training for mental health professionals. This article aims to support clinicians and researchers in their recognition of, and response to, weight stigma and size privilege. Further, this article asserts that training in sizeism is essential for the multicultural competencies of mental health providers, psychological science researchers, and those in allied fields. As such, methods for recognizing, situating, and challenging size privilege are proposed.

Indexed as

Anti-fat biasmulticultural competencesizeismsize privilegethin privilegeweight biasweight stigma

Identifiers

PMID40620534
PMCPMC12225618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.