Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40620533›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in pediatrics2025

What is the Role of Caffeine in the Management of Preterm Infants?

David M Rub, Eric C Eichenwald

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David M RubDivision of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA USA.
Eric C EichenwaldDivision of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA USA.

Funding

Pediatric Hospital Epidemiology and Outcomes Research Training ProgramT32HD060550 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI Christopher Peter Bonafide, John Chris Feudtner · 2010 to 2026
$6.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS L40 HL176224NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD060550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: To describe how clinical practice around caffeine therapy for apnea of prematurity has shifted in response to emerging data, with particular emphasis on changes in initiation timing, dosing strategies, and treatment duration. Recent Findings: Several new studies have begun to explore alternative approaches to caffeine therapy, including trials of caffeine initiation in the delivery room, increased loading and maintenance dosing, and extended use through later postmenstrual ages. Notably, the MOCHA and ICAF trials offer new insights into the potential risks and benefits of prolonging therapy beyond traditional discontinuation thresholds. These studies reflect growing interest in tailoring caffeine treatment to the evolving physiology of preterm infants, though long-term outcomes remain under investigation. Summary: Clinical use of caffeine has evolved far beyond the original CAP protocol, driven by physiologic rationale and early trial signals, but often outpaces the strength of the evidence. Future multicenter, randomized trials are essential to confirm safety and efficacy of earlier initiation, higher dosing, and extended duration and to ensure that practice refinements translate into durable improvements in preterm infant outcomes worldwide.

Indexed as

ApneaCaffeineNeonatePrematurity

Identifiers

PMID40620533
PMCPMC12222379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.