ReviewNorth American Spine Society journal2025
Scapular pain in cervical radiculopathy: A scoping review.
Review in North American Spine Society journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Controversy persists regarding the relationship between scapular pain and cervical radiculopathy, with no consensus on cervical radiculopathy's definition, radicular pain distribution, or the diagnostic value of scapular pain. This review aims to map the literature describing scapular pain distribution in cervical radiculopathy in clinical practice and research. Methods: This scoping review followed JBI methodology, guided by the PRISMA-ScR extension. Studies reporting on cervical radiculopathies with described radicular pain distribution were included. Exclusions applied to radicular pain from peripheral neuropathy, fracture, cancer, rheumatologic, or vascular disorders, and inadequately described scapular pain. Information sources included Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL. JBI methodology was followed, guided by the PRISMA-ScR extension. Pain distributions were mapped by region, cervical nerve root level, and diagnostic confirmation methods. Results: The review included 86 studies (1957-2022). Among the 81 studies describing pain distribution, neck (88%), arm (85%), and scapula (72%) were most frequently reported. Of 60 studies documenting pain by nerve root level, C6 (82%), C7 (77%), and C8 (63%) were most common, with C7 showing the highest percentage of scapular pain descriptions. Evidence indicates scapular pain may precede arm pain by several weeks in cervical radiculopathy. Conclusions: Evidence supports scapular pain as a symptom of cervical radiculopathy, potentially preceding arm pain by weeks. Future studies should document symptoms at onset, define radicular pain distributions, include participants with scapular pain, and assess the diagnostic utility of scapular pain in cervical radiculopathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.