Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40620489›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

Rhizobacteria consortium improves growth, yield, and phytochemicals in Robusta coffee (

Ni Luh Suriani, Mohammed Al-Zharani, Fahd A Nasr, Lina M Alneghery, Dewa Ngurah Suprapta, I Nyoman Suarsana, Ni Made Delly Resiani, Hesham Ali El Enshasy, Riyaz Sayyed, Jayanthi Barasarathi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ni Luh SurianiBiology Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia.
Mohammed Al-ZharaniBiology Department, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fahd A NasrBiology Department, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Lina M AlnegheryBiology Department, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Dewa Ngurah SupraptaBiopesticide Laboratory, Agriculture Faculty, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia.
I Nyoman SuarsanaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia.
Ni Made Delly ResianiNational Research and Innovation Agency, Central Jakarta, Indonesia.
Hesham Ali El EnshasyFaculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Johor Bahru, Malaysia.
Riyaz SayyedDepartment of Biological Sciences and Chemistry, College of Arts and Science, University of Nizwa, Nizwa, Oman.
Jayanthi BarasarathiFaculty of Health & Life Sciences (FHLS), INTI International University, Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.
Ting Seng HoBack2Nature Organic Farm, Kuala Pilah, Malaysia.
Yulmira YantiDepartment of Plant Pests and Diseases, Agriculture Faculty, Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Coffee is among the most sought-after and valued commodities because it has a high market value and serves as a soothing beverage. However, organically grown coffee remains limited. Most coffee farmers still use agrochemicals which, pose harmful effects. Therefore, alternative methods are needed to produce healthier crops, such as utilizing rhizobacteria, which are environmentally friendly and safe for human health. Methods: Through this study, rhizobacteria treatment was applied to coffee plants to enhance growth, phytochemical content, and antioxidant activity. The present study aimed to determine the influence of rhizobacteria on the growth, production, and phytochemical content of Balinese robusta coffee plants. The research utilized a randomized group approach with four different treatments, six repetitions, and three units, resulting in a total of 72 experimental plants. F0 represents the control group with untreated soil, while F1, F2, and F3 correspond to treatments with 2% Results: The results indicated that the F1, F2, and F3 treatments showed a notable distinction in comparison to the control. The F3 treatment proved to be the most efficient in enhancing growth, antioxidant activity, alkaloid content, tannin levels, caffeine concentration, and coffee production, whereas the F2 treatment resulted in the highest flavonoid content. Both types of rhizobacteria can generate IAA, facilitate nitrogen fixation, and solubilize phosphorus. Moreover, all four rhizobacteria are capable of colonizing the roots of Robusta Bali coffee. Discussion: The two rhizobacteria, B.

Indexed as

biofertilizerbiostimulantscoffeerhizobacteriasustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID40620489
PMCPMC12227014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.