Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40620465›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2025

Dose-Dependent Effects of Remimazolam on Early Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorders in Elderly Colorectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery.

Zhenqi Liu, Xinyu Zhang, Xuebing Wang, Ziyang Liu, Yong Pang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Methodology of analysis of cognitive impairment in longitudinal randomized clinical trials in oncology: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhenqi LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong City, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China.
Xinyu ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong City, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China.
Xuebing WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong City, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China.
Ziyang LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong City, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China.
Yong PangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong City, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To study the effect of different doses of remimazolam on the maintenance of anesthesia and its impact on postoperative cognitive function in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Methods: A total of 120 elderly patients scheduled for laparoscopic colorectal surgery under general anesthesia (both sexes included, ASA grade (II-III) were randomly assigned to experimental groups (R1-R3) and control group (P), with 30 cases per group. The experimental groups received different remimazolam maintenance doses: R1 (0.5 mg/kg/h), R2 (1.0 mg/kg/h), and R3 (1.5 mg/kg/h), while the control group received propofol for sedation. Perioperative cognitive function was evaluated using MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination) and MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) preoperatively, and on postoperative days 3 and 7, to analyze differences in cognitive effects and safety profiles of remimazolam across the four groups. Results: A total of 117 patients were ultimately included, with 3 excluded due to intraoperative conversion to open surgery. Participants were randomly allocated into four groups according to remimazolam maintenance dosing regimens: 30 in the R1 group, 28 in the R2 group, 30 in the R3 group, and 29 in the P group.There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative cognitive function scores between the R2 and R3 groups, and both groups had scores that were significantly higher than those of the R1 and P groups, with statistically significant differences. Conclusion: Compared to propofol, remimazolam at medium and high doses can reduce the incidence of perioperative neurocognitive dysfunction in elderly patients. High-dose remimazolam anesthesia maintenance may prolong extubation time, increase the incidence of postoperative shivering, and potentially lead to re-sedation after awakening, so medium-dose remimazolam is more suitable for intraoperative anesthesia maintenance in elderly patients without increasing the incidence of adverse events.

Indexed as

BenzodiazepinesColorectal NeoplasmsLaparoscopyNeurocognitive DisordersAgedAged, 80 and overDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleBenzodiazepinesremimazolamcognitive functionelderlygeneral anesthesiaremimazolam

Identifiers

PMID40620465
PMCPMC12226997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.