Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40620407›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2025

The Effect of Running Speed on Cadence and Running Kinetics.

Abbey Leacox, Lucy Fashingbauer, Thomas Ferguson, Anna Zajakowski, Brian Baum, Mark Reinking

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Running is associated with intervertebral disc adaptations: a pre-planned secondary analysis of the ASTEROID randomised controlled trial.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abbey LeacoxSchool of Rehabilitative and Health Sciences Regis University.
Lucy FashingbauerSchool of Rehabilitative and Health Sciences Regis University.
Thomas FergusonSchool of Rehabilitative and Health Sciences Regis University.
Anna ZajakowskiSchool of Rehabilitative and Health Sciences Regis University.
Brian BaumSTRIVE Center MIT Lincoln Laboratory.
Mark ReinkingSchool of Rehabilitative and Health Sciences Regis University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have shown that a lower running cadence (<170 steps/min) increases the risk of injury in runners. However, the immediate effect of increasing running speed on running cadence and ground reaction forces in experienced runners has not been well studied. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to examine the immediate effect of running speed on running cadence and ground reaction forces in a sample of experienced runners. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Thirty runners ages 21-49 (11 female, 19 male) consented to participate. Inclusion criteria included running at least 24 km (15 miles) per week for the past year, and no running-related injury in the prior three months. Subjects completed a 6-minute acclimatization to running on an instrumented treadmill, during which they identified their preferred training pace. After a short break, each runner then ran at seven predetermined speeds in the order as listed: 2.68 m/s, 2.82 m/s, 2.98 m/s, 3.35 m/s, 3.58 m/s, and 3.83 m/sec. Participants ran for 90 seconds at each of the speeds and during the final 30 seconds of each running bout, cadence was counted and ground reaction forces were recorded. Ground reaction forces measured included overall peak vertical force, vertical impact peak, vertical average loading rate, peak braking force, and braking impulse. Temporospatial and ground reaction forces were analyzed using repeated measures general linear model. Kinetic data from left and right limbs were compared using paired t-tests. Results: No significant differences existed between the right and left limb force data so only the left limb data are reported. Mean cadence increased from 169 steps/min at 2.68 m/s to 178 steps/min (p<0.001) at 3.83 m/s. All ground reaction force variables also increased significantly (p<0.001) from the slow to fast speed. Both stance time and step time decreased significantly (p<0.001) from the slow to the fast speed. Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that in a group of experienced runners, as running speed increases, both cadence and ground reaction forces increase. Concurrently, both stance time and step time decreased. Level of Evidence: Level 3.

Indexed as

assessmentbiomechanicsgait analysisrunning

Identifiers

PMID40620407
PMCPMC12222555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.