ArticleF&S reports2025
Laparoscopic uterine fixation and ovarian pexy for fertility and ovarian preservation in a 40-year-old with anal cancer.
Article in F&S reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robotic uterine transposition and reposition in a patient with rectal cancer: complete case report and surgical perspective.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Robotic uterine transposition for fertility preservation in a patient undergoing pelvic radiation: a case report and surgical perspective.F&S reports · 2025Article
- Uterine fixation: advancing a multidisciplinary strategy for fertility preservation.F&S reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe a novel multidisciplinary approach to preserve ovarian function and fertility in a 40-year-old woman with newly diagnosed anal cancer. Design: Case study of a multidisciplinary ovarian and fertility preservation strategy. Patient: A 40-year-old nulliparous woman with a newly diagnosed stage IIA squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the anal canal and a history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 3, status post LEEP). Exposure: The patient underwent an oocyte retrieval, followed by laparoscopic ovarian and uterine pexy to minimize radiation dose to the ovaries and uterus. She subsequently received external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Main Outcome Measures: Radiation dose to the ovaries and uterus; preservation of ovarian function and reproductive potential. Results: The estimated mean radiation doses to the ovaries were limited to <500 cGy, cumulatively, potentially preserving ovarian function, whereas without ovarian transposition, the ovaries would have received at least 4,200 cGy, which would have certainly caused premature primary ovarian insufficiency (POI). Additionally, the uterus received a modestly lower dose than it would have without the uterine pexy. This collaborative approach resulted in a decreased likelihood of early menopause, underscoring the importance of centralized and coordinated care. Conclusion: This case study underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach involving fertility, gynecology, and radiation oncology departments to ensure an integrated care model focused on preserving fertility and ovarian function. It supports the growing body of evidence that standardized coordination among these specialties is essential and aligns with broader efforts to prioritize fertility preservation in cancer care planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.