Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40620351›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

The topology of representational geometry.

Shael Brown, Reza Farivar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shael BrownDepartment of Quantitative Life Sciences, Farivar Lab, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Reza FarivarDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, McGill Vision Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Representational similarity analysis (RSA) is a powerful tool for abstracting and then comparing neural representations across brains, regions, models and modalities. However, typical RSA analyses compares pairs of representational dissimilarities to judge similarity of two neural systems, and we argue that such methods cannot capture the shape of representational spaces. By leveraging tools from computational topology which can probe the shape of high-dimensional data, we augment RSA to be able to detect more subtle yet real differences and similarities of representational structures. This new method could be used in conjunction with regular RSA in order to make distinct, complementary inferences about neural function.

Indexed as

fMRIhumanmacaqueobject representationpersistent homologyrepresentational geometryrepresentational similarity analysistopological data analysis

Identifiers

PMID40620351
PMCPMC12226496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.