ArticlePalliative care and social practice2025
Ethical reflection: The palliative care ethos and patients who refuse information.
Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Navigating patients' refusal of information in clinical practice - a clinical scenario.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2026Article
- Healthcare professionals' perceptions of ethical issues in palliative sedation: A moral case deliberation study in eight European countries.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Profiles of palliative day care programs in Canada and the United Kingdom: A meta-synthesis.Palliative care and social practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Situations wherein a patient refuses potentially important information present tricky ethical challenges for palliative care staff. This critical essay looks to both mainstream bioethics and the palliative care ethos for recommendations on whether or not to provide information in such situations. Such cases highlight controversies surrounding autonomy within mainstream bioethics, making the latter an unlikely source of clear and coherent guidance on this specific topic. The palliative care ethos, as presented by authors within the palliative care community claiming to (re)present such an ethos, may be a more promising source for practical and ethical recommendations. Eleven aspects of the palliative care ethos that may be relevant for such situations are presented, and their implications, individually and collectively, are summarised. Taken as a whole, the palliative care ethos seems to recommend a strategy of using communication skills and time to try to get information across to the patient without forcing things. The recommendation is nuanced and highly contextualised, which increases its validity for clinical practice. Some meta-ethical questions are discussed regarding the use of the palliative care ethos as a source of guidance in ethically challenging clinical situations. All in all, probing the palliative care ethos for practical guidance is an interesting possibility that deserves further ethical and practical reflection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.