Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40620336›Full record

ArticlePalliative care and social practice2025

What do physicians want at the end? An international qualitative study on physicians' personal end-of-life preferences and what influences them.

Sarah Mroz, Frederick Daenen, Sigrid Dierickx, Freddy Mortier, Ludovica De Panfilis, Luca Ghirotto, Toby Campbell, Kenneth Chambaere, Luc Deliens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sarah MrozEnd-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3851-8385
Frederick DaenenEnd-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.
Sigrid DierickxEnd-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.
Freddy MortierEnd-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.
Ludovica De PanfilisDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy.
Luca GhirottoUnità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Toby CampbellUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Kenneth ChambaereEnd-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6277-072X
Luc DeliensEnd-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8158-2422

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Physicians play a key role in end-of-life decision-making. As research suggests a connection between physicians' personal end-of-life preferences and their clinical practice, it is important to understand what physicians want for themselves at the end of life and what has shaped their preferences. Objective: To explore what physicians have considered for their end-of-life preferences, including life-sustaining and life-shortening practices, and their perceptions of the socio-cultural factors that influence their preferences. Design: Qualitative study using in-depth interviews. Methods: Forty-five interviews were conducted from January to November 2022 using a semi-structured interview guide. Participants included three types of physicians: general practitioners, palliative care physicians, and other medical specialists in Belgium (Flanders), Italy, and the United States (Wisconsin). Data collection and analysis were informed using the reflexive thematic analysis approach. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and NVivo 14 was used for coding and analysis. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) were followed. Results: We found physicians, particularly those in palliative care, have reflected on their end-of-life preferences and have ideas about what constitutes a good death and what they hope to avoid. Most physicians prefer to avoid aggressive and life-prolonging treatment, physical and mental suffering, and being a burden. They prioritize being in a peaceful environment and communication with loved ones. Various factors influence preferences including cultural, social, and religious beliefs, and legislative environment, but most significant are the deaths of loved ones and clinical practice. Death and dying become normalized the more they are reflected upon and discussed, and this process can also provide personal growth which helps physicians provide better care to patients and families. Conclusion: Physicians have reflected on their end-of-life preferences and prefer a peaceful end of life without aggressive and life-prolonging treatment. Physicians' views on end-of-life practices are influenced by evolving cultural and societal norms and legal and ethical factors.

Indexed as

end-of-life careeuthanasiapalliative carephysician-assisted dyingqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID40620336
PMCPMC12227937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.