Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40620324›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2025

Learning-by-Concordance Approach in Health Professions Education: A Scoping Review.

Antoine Roche, Ann Alexandra Rodriguez Turcot, Andréanne St-Pierre, Sarah Cherrier, Marie-Claude Audétat, Bernard Charlin, Joseph-Omer Dyer

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Antoine RocheInstitut de Formation en Masso-Kinésithérapie (IFMK) de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7280-8186
Ann Alexandra Rodriguez TurcotSchool of rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Andréanne St-PierreSchool of rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Sarah CherrierFaculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Marie-Claude AudétatUDREM Unit of development and research in medical education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Bernard CharlinInterdisciplinary research group on cognition and professional reasoning, Center for Research in Health Pedagogy, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montreal, C.P. 6128 Succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal, H3C 3J7, Quebec, Canada.
Joseph-Omer DyerSchool of rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Learning by concordance (LbC) is an educational approach designed to develop expertise, particularly in the field of clinical reasoning (CR) among healthcare professionals. It is based on the script concordance test (SCT) with the addition of feedback based on expert responses. The objective of this study was to map the scientific literature on this rapidly growing learning approach. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and Google Scholar up to March 10, 2025. Eligible primary studies had to focus on the LbC approach targeting healthcare learners. Results: Twenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria: twenty focused on the implementation of the LbC approach and eight on its development. Most of the studies used mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative). The results mainly indicate that learners perceive the LbC approach as engaging and beneficial for decision-making. The articles mention five elements related to the development of LbC that would contribute to its success. Discussion: The LbC approach could be applicable to a wide range of disciplines and learning levels. The variability in the procedures for developing the approach, as well as the variability of the objectives and methodologies of the studies, limit the comparability of the results. Conclusion: LbC is a promising approach for promoting decision-making skills in a variety of uncertain clinical contexts. The concept of standardized development and evaluation frameworks for this approach could improve its applicability, effectiveness and reproducibility.

Indexed as

Health OccupationsHealth PersonnelLearningClinical CompetenceClinical ReasoningEducational MeasurementHumans

Identifiers

PMID40620324
PMCPMC12227079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.