Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40620315›Full record

ArticlePaediatric & neonatal pain2025

A Critical Evaluation of the COMFORTneo Scale's Validity and Applicability for Preterm Infants.

Erik Koning, Arend F Bos, Elisabeth M W Kooi, Alexander J de Tempe, Nienke H van Dokkum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric & neonatal pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erik KoningDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen Groningen the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5394-071X
Arend F BosDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen Groningen the Netherlands.
Elisabeth M W KooiDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen Groningen the Netherlands.
Alexander J de TempeIndependent, Practicing Physiotherapist and Clinical Epidemiologist in Training Haarlem the Netherlands.
Nienke H van DokkumDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen Groningen the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2706-0372

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COMFORTneo scale is widely used to assess pain in infants, yet its validity for extremely preterm (EPT) infants (< 26 weeks' gestation) remains unclear. This study evaluated the scale's ability to distinguish pain in EPT versus PT infants (26-37 weeks' gestation). We performed a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary neonatology intensive care unit, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands. All infants were born before 37 weeks' gestation between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2022. The COMFORTneo scale's unidimensionality was assessed using the partial credit model, and its discriminatory ability between EPT and PT infants was evaluated through differential item functioning plots. Among 1021 infants, 106 were EPT. The COMFORTneo scale indicated unidimensionality for all preterm infants. However, in EPT infants, alertness and facial tension did not effectively discriminate between pain and no pain in ventilated infants, while agitation and muscle tone failed to discriminate in non-ventilated infants. While the COMFORTneo scale is unidimensional for preterm infants, the discriminatory ability of this scale between ventilated and non-ventilated EPT infants is limited.

Indexed as

AssessmentNICUPainPreterm

Identifiers

PMID40620315
PMCPMC12224991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.