ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025
A randomized safety study of tolerance to table rotation in dynamic trajectory radiotherapy in healthy volunteers.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving reirradiation of recurrent non-small cell lung cancer through non-coplanar beam arrangements.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to show that table movement of dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) does not induce more motion sickness than standard-of-care non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (ncVMAT). Forty-one healthy volunteers underwent dry-runs of DTRT and ncVMAT in four different, randomly allocated sequences. The primary outcome was the Motion Sickness Assessment Questionnaire (MSAQ) summary score. The average change in MSAQ summary score before to after dry-runs was 1.88 for DTRT and 1.62 for ncVMAT. The difference between both techniques was 0.26 [95% CI: -0.24 to 0.75]; the CI demonstrated non-inferiority of DTRT to ncVMAT for motion sickness in healthy volunteers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.