Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40620220›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2025

Are cell length and volume interchangeable in cell cycle analysis?

Prathitha Kar, Ariel Amir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Prathitha KarDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts; School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Ariel AmirDepartment of Physics of Complex Systems, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. Electronic address: ariel.amir@weizmann.ac.il.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell length has been used as a proxy for cell size in cell cycle modeling studies. A previous study, however, brought into question the validity of this assumption, noting that correlations between cell lengths can be different from those involving cell volume if cell width fluctuations are taken into account. If cell volume is regulated, data analysis involving cell lengths will lead to an incorrect inference of the cell size control mechanism. We used conditional correlation of length variables conditioned upon radius variables to elucidate the underlying volume control mechanism. Using the conditional correlation on previous mother machine datasets measuring lengths at birth and division and the cell radius for multiple cells, we find that the cell volume control strategy is consistent with an adder model. Further, using the conditional correlation, we conclude that measurement noise constitutes a significant portion of the radius variability in the experimental datasets. To conclude, cell length and cell volume can often be used interchangeably owing to small cell width fluctuations.

Indexed as

Cell CycleCell SizeModels, BiologicalHumans

Identifiers

PMID40620220
PMCPMC12256882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.