ArticleJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2025
Service readiness of primary healthcare facilities for dengue management in Bagmati Province, Nepal: a mixed method study.
Article in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dengue Fever Resurgence in Iran: An Integrative Review of Causative Factors and Control Strategies.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn Nepal, frequent dengue outbreaks have been reported in the past decades leading abrupt and substantial burden to healthcare system. Thus, this study aimed to assess dengue service readiness and factors influencing readiness at health facilities level.
methodsA convergent parallel mixed method study was conducted in 131 primary healthcare facilities of the Bagmati Province. Key informant interviews were carried out for exploring facilitators and barriers for dengue service readiness.
resultsThe majority of primary healthcare facilities were found with sub-optimal readiness for dengue i.e. 63.4% of facilities and readiness was found varied by health facility type, settings, ecological region, and districts. In the study, health facility type [Primary healthcare centers Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR): 6.1, CI: 1.5-23.9], review and trend analysis practice [AOR: 3.6, CI: 1.1-11.6], and facilities meetings [AOR: 5.8, CI: 1.2-26.7] were identified as key predictors for service readiness. External supervision, quality assurance practice and stakeholder sensitization were explored as facilitators for the readiness.
conclusionsImproving and expanding dengue services in all primary healthcare facilities, and ecological regions, having regular facilities meeting, review and trend analysis practice and stakeholder sensitization can enhance dengue service readiness at facility level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.