Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40619991›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2025

Testosterone Administration Induces a Red Shift in Democrats.

Rana Alogaily, Giti Zahedzadeh, Kenneth V Pyle, Cameron J Johnson, Paul J Zak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rana AlogailyCenter for Neuroeconomics Studies, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, California, USA.
Giti ZahedzadehCenter for Neuroeconomics Studies, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, California, USA.
Kenneth V PyleCenter for Neuroeconomics Studies, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, California, USA.
Cameron J JohnsonDepartment of Psychiatry, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California, USA.
Paul J ZakCenter for Neuroeconomics Studies, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4563-8406

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAn experiment was run to test if a testosterone administration would influence the political preferences of 136 healthy males.

methodSynthetic testosterone or placebo was administered to participants who identified the strength of their political affiliation.

resultsBefore the testosterone treatment, we found that weakly affiliated Democrats had 19% higher basal testosterone than those who identified strongly with the party (p = 0.015). When weakly affiliated Democrats received additional testosterone, the strength of their party affiliation fell by 12% (p = 0.01), and they reported 45% warmer feelings towards Republican candidates for president (p < 0.001). Testosterone administration did not affect political preferences for strongly affiliated Democrats or strong or weak Republicans.

conclusionOur results demonstrate that testosterone induces a "red shift" among weakly affiliated Democrats, providing evidence that testosterone affects political preferences.

Indexed as

PoliticsTestosteroneAdultHumansMaleYoung AdultTestosterone

Identifiers

PMID40619991
PMCPMC12230349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.