Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40619937›Full record

SynthesisMicrobiologyOpen2025

Biofilm Formation on Endotracheal and Tracheostomy Tubing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Culture Data and Sampling Method.

Ed Deshmukh-Reeves, Matthew Shaw, Charlotte Bilsby, Campbell W Gourlay

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in MicrobiologyOpen, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Non-Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Molecular, biofilm and motility characterization ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ed Deshmukh-ReevesSchool of Biosciences, Division of Natural Sciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0511-7854
Matthew ShawSchool of Biosciences, Division of Natural Sciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2721-5435
Charlotte BilsbySchool of Biosciences, Division of Natural Sciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3585-2996
Campbell W GourlaySchool of Biosciences, Division of Natural Sciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2373-6788

Funding

This study was supported by an industrial CASE studentship between University of Kent and ICU Medical Inc.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilm formation on tracheal tubing is a key risk factor for ventilator-associated pneumonia. Endotracheal tube microbiology has been systematically reviewed, but tracheostomy tube profiles have not. Analysis of the tube-associated microbiome is not standardised, and sampling methods are varied. We compared the reported microbiomes of endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes and examined the impact of sampling by tracheal aspiration or direct culture. We searched PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Knowledge for clinical microbiology studies from 2000-2024, extracting tubing type, sampling method, and the most prevalent genera identified. Genera were compared by Spearman's rank correlation and pairwise analyses by Šidák's test. Extraction from 49 studies identified 30 genera. Pseudomonas was the most prevalent in all conditions followed by Klebsiella, Staphylococcus, and Acinetobacter. 25 studies performed tracheal aspiration, and 22, direct culture. Two studies used both methods. Correlation was observed between endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes, and aspirates and direct cultures (Spearman's rho = 0.69; 0.59). Pseudomonas were more prevalent in tracheostomy tubes (p < 0.0001). Coagulase-positive Staphylococci were more common in tracheal aspirates, and coagulase-negative Staphylococci in direct culture. The microbial profiles of endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes are comparable, with Pseudomonas being the most common coloniser. Our analyses suggest that tracheal aspiration can effectively identify the constituents of biofilms without requiring tube removal, making it a valuable tool for clinical researchers to analyse or monitor biofilms before extubation or device failure using existing microbiology procedures.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiofilmsIntubation, IntratrachealTracheostomyEquipment ContaminationHumansMicrobiotaPneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedTracheabiofilmmicrobiomePseudomonasrespiratory infections

Identifiers

PMID40619937
PMCPMC12230368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.