ArticleTurkish journal of orthodontics2025
3-Dimensional Evaluation of Enamel Thickness to Guide Orthodontic Interproximal Reduction: A CBCT-Based Study Across Gender and Ethnicity.
Article in Turkish journal of orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to explore variations in enamel thickness to provide guidelines for optimal interproximal enamel reduction in an untreated population using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: CBCT scans of 100 orthodontic patients (51 Caucasian, 49 patients of Somalian descent; aged (12-18) were analyzed retrospectively. Enamel thickness was measured at the mesial and distal contact points of teeth from the second molar to the central incisor in both the maxillary and mandibular arches. Linear mixed models were employed to assess the effects of ethnicity, gender, anterior-posterior region, and mesial-distal proximal surfaces on enamel thickness. Fixed effects were estimated using the Kenward-Roger method, and a random intercept with an unstructured covariance matrix was included to account for within-subject variability. Ethnicity-specific residual variances were also modeled. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: Enamel thickness varied significantly between Caucasians and Somalians in both the maxilla and mandible (p<0.001), with greater thickness observed in Caucasians. Gender-related differences were minimal; however, in the maxilla, distal surfaces of posterior teeth had greater enamel thickness in females compared to males (p=0.0478). Enamel thickness was consistently greater on distal surfaces of posterior teeth (p<0.001), while no significant differences were observed between mesial and distal surfaces in anterior teeth (p>0.05). Conclusion: Posterior teeth, particularly distal proximal surfaces of premolars and molars hold a great potential for enamel reduction, offering clinicians the most optimal site in orthodontic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.