ArticleTurkish journal of orthodontics2025
Does LeFort I Surgery Have Any Influence on External Root Resorption?
Article in Turkish journal of orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate root resorption on maxillary teeth neighboring osteotomy sites in response to segmental LeFort I osteotomy over time. Methods: Eighteen subjects, aged 18 to 65 years with pre-surgery (T0), post-surgery (T1), and long-term follow-up (T2) CBCT records were included. Sixteen control subjects, aged 17.67 to 62.33 years, with pre-treatment (T0), progress (T1), and long-term progress orthodontic (T2) CBCT records were also used. Maxillary central incisor, canine, and first molar roots were segmented. The volume, surface area, and root length changes were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA and mean differences across follow-up periods. Significance was set at p<0.05. Results: The surgical group had an overall increase in the amount of root resorption in all time comparisons and variables with significance (p<0.05) in length, volume, and surface area. When comparing mean differences between the control and surgical groups, no significant differences were observed except for a few variables. Conclusion: LeFort I segmental osteotomy in conjunction with orthodontic treatment, induces root resorption. However, except for a few variables, the differences compared to orthodontic treatment alone are not statistically significant. Moreover, these findings are clinically insignificant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.