ArticleBJPsych open2025
Let's Talk About Voices: randomised controlled crossover study of a resource to support mental health workers in supporting voice-hearers.
Article in BJPsych open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEasily accessible, impactful, evidence-based resources are needed to assist mental health workers to best support voice-hearers in managing and living well with voices. Let's Talk About Voices (LTAV) is an innovative suite of resources designed for mental health workers to use in supporting voice-hearers.
aimThis study aimed to assess the impact of LTAV on mental health workers' self-reported capacity to work with voice-hearers.
methodA randomised, controlled crossover design was used, with assessment at three time points. The assessment measure was co-developed by researchers, clinicians, peer workers and voice-hearers based on the aims of LTAV and the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Participants were randomised into two groups. The immediate group received access to LTAV following the first assessment; the delayed group received access following the second assessment. In total, 256 mental health workers commenced the study, with 120 completing all assessments.
resultsBetween-group comparisons for change between times 1 and 2 found a significant difference with a large effect size (
conclusionsThis research indicates that LTAV has the potential to substantially improve mental health workers' attitudes and confidence in supporting voice-hearers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.