ArticleAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)2025
Step Test for Rapid Screening of Material and Process Parameters for Resin Development in DLP 3D Printing.
Article in Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expanding the Usage of Lignin in DLP 3D Printing by Optimized Synthesis and Processing Parameters.ACS applied polymer materials · 2025Article
- Step Test for Rapid Screening of Material and Process Parameters for Resin Development in DLP 3D Printing.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Article
- 4D Printing of Magnetically Responsive Materials and Their Applications.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The success of 3D printing based on vat polymerization by spatially controlled UV light exposure strongly depends on appropriate resins. However, in search of new resins, optimizing a resin's composition as well as its printing parameters can be time-consuming and labor-intensive. To address these challenges, we present a rapid parameter screening that enables efficient evaluation of 24 printing parameter settings within one print focusing on exposure energy, exposure time, and layer thickness as the most crucial process parameters in 3D printing based on digital light processing (DLP). Our step test minimizes the required number of experimental iterations and 3D prints by relying on optical characterization without the need for special analytical devices, making it rapid and accessible for a broad range of users across different disciplines. For a proof of concept, the step test is applied to define optimal printing parameters of three commercial resins and evaluate the polymerization efficiency of two predominantly biobased, noncommercial resins containing either phenylbis(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)phosphine oxide or curcumin as photoinitiators. With that, we introduce a straightforward test that is easy to implement and adaptable to other UV polymerization-based printing methods, speeding up the time from resin screening to optimal printing parameters and products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.