ArticleJournal of experimental botany2025
Contrasting photosynthetic, stomatal, and mesophyll mechanisms drive common reductions in leaf water-use efficiency under blue light.
Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Colored Leaves ofACS omega · 2026Article
- Pigment-Structure Leaf Syndromes in Poinsettia (ACS omega · 2026Article
- Transcriptome Dynamics Provide Insight into the Mechanisms Underlying Cucumber Stomatal Movement Regulated by Blue Light (BL) and Drought Stress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Effects of saturation flash protocols on photosynthetic induction and assessment of mesophyll conductance and maximum carboxylation rate sensitivity to parameter inputs inFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Forests experience complex light environments, but the detailed roles of photosynthetic, stomatal, mesophyll, and biochemical responses to dynamic blue light remain unclear in tree species. We measured the blue-light responses of leaf gas exchange, online isotope discrimination, photorespiration, and chlorophyll fluorescence in grey alder (Alnus incana) and holm oak (Quercus ilex), and investigated the underlying biochemical and physiological mechanisms. With increasing blue light, differing photosynthetic and stomatal responses consistently led to a decrease in intrinsic water-use efficiency (iWUE) in the two species. For alder, the decline in iWUE was primarily due to a reduced photosynthesis rate (An); for oak, although An also decreased, blue-light-stimulated stomatal opening played a major role. Although the reduction in An was linked to blue-light-induced photoprotective processes in alder, it was coordinated with mesophyll conductance (gm) in both species. The maximum carboxylation rate of Rubisco and gm imposed considerable photosynthetic limitations, especially at high blue-light levels. However, the component of gm that responded to blue light and coordinated with An was the chloroplast membrane in alder whereas it was the cell wall and plasma membrane in oak. Our findings highlight species-specific physiological strategies in the response to blue light and underscore the importance of considering spectral composition when assessing carbon-water trade-offs in forest trees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.