ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
pMHChat, characterizing the interactions between major histocompatibility complex class II molecules and peptides with large language models and deep hypergraph learning.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-driven neoantigen identification: a comprehensive review from somatic variant calling to T cell recognition.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models for Cancer Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Multimodal learning on heterogeneous subgraphs and LLMs representation for MHC-peptide binding affinity prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Revolution in Transcriptomics: From Single Cells to Spatial Atlases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Characterizing the binding interactions between major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules and peptides is crucial for studying the immune system, offering potential applications for neoantigen design, vaccine development, and personalized immunotherapy. Motivated by this profound meaning, we developed a model that integrates large language models (LLMs) and deep hypergraph learning for predicting MHC class II-peptide binding reactivity, affinity, and residue contact profiling. pMHChat takes MHC pseudo-sequences and peptide sequences as inputs and processes them through four stages: LLMs fine-tune stage, feature encoding and map fusion stage, task-specific prediction stage, and downstream analysis stage. pMHChat distinguishes itself in capturing contextually relevant and high-order spatial interactions of the peptide-MHC (pMHC) complex. Specifically, in a five-fold cross-validation experiment, pMHChat achieves superior performance, with a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.8744 and an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.8390 in the binding reactivity task, as well as a mean Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.7311 in the binding affinity prediction task. Furthermore, pMHChat also demonstrates the best performance in both the leave-one-molecule-out setting and independent evaluation. Notably, pMHChat can provide residue contact profiling, showing its potential application in recognizing critical binding patterns of the pMHC complex. Our findings highlight pMHChat's capacity to advance both predictive accuracy and detailed insights into the MHC-peptide binding process. We anticipate that pMHChat will serve as a powerful tool for elucidating MHC-peptide interactions, with promising applications in immunological research and therapeutic development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.