ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Gene regulatory network integration with multi-omics data enhances survival predictions in cancer.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating transposable elements into blood gene regulatory networks reveals connectivity loss for schizophrenia genes.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- DataXflowGen for GenAI-driven model generation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- CAGAD: dynamic community attention for prediction gene regulatory network.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2026Article
- Beyond single biomarkers: multi-omics strategies to predict immunotherapy outcomes in blood cancers.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The emergence of high-throughput omics technologies has resulted in their wide application to cancer studies, greatly increasing our understanding of the disruptions occurring at different molecular levels. To fully harness these data, integrative approaches have emerged as essential tools, enabling the combination of multiple omics modalities to uncover disease mechanisms. However, many such approaches overlook gene regulatory mechanisms, which play a central role in the development and progression of cancer. Patient-specific gene regulatory networks (GRNs), representing interactions between regulators (such as transcription factors) and their target genes in each individual tumour, offer a powerful framework to bridge this gap and investigate the regulatory landscape of cancer. In this study, we introduce a novel approach for integrating patient-specific GRNs with multi-omic data and assess whether their inclusion in joint dimensionality reduction models improves survival prediction across multiple cancer types. By applying our method on ten cancer datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas, we demonstrate that incorporating GRNs enhances associations with patient survival in several cancer types. Focusing on liver cancer, with validation in independent data, our methodology identifies potential mechanisms of gene regulatory dysregulation associated with cancer progression. These were linked to dysregulated fatty acid metabolism, and identified JUND as a potential novel transcriptional regulator driving these processes. Our findings highlight the value of network-based multi-omics integration for uncovering clinically relevant regulatory mechanisms and improving our understanding of cancer biology at the patient-specific level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.