Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40619802›Full record

Trial reportBalkan medical journal2025

Ultrasound-Guided Pleural Needle Biopsy Which Needle for Which Patient: A Prospective Randomized Study.

Emre Çelik, Muzaffer Metintaş, Güntülü Ak, Hüseyin Yıldırım, Emine Dündar, Nevin Aydın, Selma Metintaş

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Balkan medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emre ÇelikDepartment of Chest Diseases, Eskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-4675-1905
Muzaffer MetintaşDepartment of Chest Diseases, Eskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-4812-0170
Güntülü AkDepartment of Chest Diseases, Eskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-8849-193X
Hüseyin YıldırımDepartment of Chest Diseases, Eskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-3011-0588
Emine DündarDepartment of Pathology, Eskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-9341-6579
Nevin AydınDepartment of Radiology, Eskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-7765-4323
Selma MetintaşLung and Pleural Cancers Research and Clinical Center, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-5002-5041

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Given the growing incidence of pleural effusions and the limited availability of medical thoracoscopy (MT) in clinical practice, ultrasound (US)-guided pleural needle biopsies using Abrams or cutting needles are increasingly being used for the histopathological diagnosis of pleural diseases. Aims: To assessed the diagnostic yield and safety of US-guided Abrams and cutting needles to determine the optimal needle type for specific clinical situations. Study Design: Prospective randomized study. Methods: The study included 174 patients with undiagnosed pleural effusion requiring histopathological evaluation. Patients were randomized into two arms: those who underwent US-guided cutting needle biopsy (US-CNPB) and those who underwent US-guided Abrams needle biopsy (US-ANPB). Results: The US-CNPB group exhibited a false-negative rate of 36.9% and diagnostic accuracy of 63.0%. compared to 21.3% and 78.7% in the US-ANPB group, with significant differences between the groups ( Conclusion: US-CNPB should be preferred in patients with pleural thickness ≥ 1 cm on US. MT is recommended for patients with pleural thickening < 1 cm or those presenting with pleural effusion without pleural thickening. However, in the absence of MT, US-ANPB is the preferred alternative because of its superior diagnostic accuracy and procedural safety.

Indexed as

Image-Guided BiopsyPleuraPleural EffusionUltrasonography, InterventionalAdultAgedBiopsy, NeedleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeedlesProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID40619802
PMCPMC12240213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.