Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40619688›Full record

SynthesisCancer science2025

Survival Benefit of Surgical Staging Before Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Pooled Analysis.

Huazhong Xu, Qu Zhang, Chengyan Luo, Mei Wang, Meng Tian, Xinchen Sun, Qin Qin

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Huazhong XuSir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Qu ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Chengyan LuoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Mei WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Meng TianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xinchen SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3453-8314
Qin QinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5070-3351

Funding

Hubei Cancer Hospital Fund 20162017B01Hubei Cancer Hospital Fund HBCHBCC-D04Hubei Innovation and Development Joint Fund for Natural Science 2025AFD817Nanjing Medical University Science and Technology Development Fund NMUB2020315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymph node metastasis significantly impacts prognosis and treatment in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Surgical staging offers precise information on node involvement, though its survival benefit is debated. We pooled data from 9 cohort studies involving 2553 patients to evaluate the benefit of pre-treatment surgical staging in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Fixed effects models or random effects models were used to calculate the pooled hazard ratios (HRs). The overall pooled results showed no difference in PFS (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.73-1.22, p = 0.65) or OS (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.74-1.35, p = 0.99) between the two approaches of lymph node staging. However, the subgroup analyses found the PFS superiority of surgical staging in patients with FIGO stage II (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.95, p = 0.02). Additionally, for the patients with no evidence of lymph node metastasis on imaging, surgical staging was associated with significantly improved PFS (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.86, p = 0.001) and OS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36-0.87, p = 0.01). In the subgroup of patients with suspicious bulky nodes on imaging, lymph node debulking-based surgical staging did not significantly improve either PFS (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.72-1.31, p = 0.31) or OS (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.68-1.99, p = 0.59) in comparison with imaging staging. Surgical staging may not be applicable to all patients with LACC. However, for the patients with FIGO II disease or those without suspicious lymph node involvement on imaging, node surgery staging could afford a survival benefit. Trial Registration: PROSPERO ID: CRD42024543768.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisimaging staginglocally advanced cervical cancermeta‐analysisradiotherapysurgical staging

Identifiers

PMID40619688
PMCPMC12400071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.