ArticleWorld journal of surgery2025
Axillary Management for Patients Undergoing Total Mastectomy and a Positive Sentinel Lymph Node: Is Axillary Dissection Necessary?
Article in World journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Axillary Management for Patients Undergoing Total Mastectomy and a Positive Sentinel Lymph Node: Is Axillary Dissection Necessary?World journal of surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe sought to evaluate whether patients with breast cancer who undergo a total mastectomy (TM) can safely forgo a completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) in the presence of one to three positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN+).
methodsA multicenter retrospective cohort study (2012-2022) was conducted in patients with cT1-3cN0 who underwent TM with 1-3 SLN+ compared by cALND versus. no further surgery. We compared overall survival (OS) and locoregional recurrence rates (LRR) and investigated whether the omission of cALND altered adjuvant treatment.
resultsIn total, the study included 139 patients with SLN+TM, with a mean tumor size of 19.44 mm (SD:10.64); 76% (n = 105) of these patients underwent SLNB-alone. Patients treated by cALND had a younger mean age than those treated by SLNB-alone (49.5 vs. 56 years and p = 0.016). Patients undergoing cALND were more likely to have macrometastatic disease (97% vs. 65% and p < 0.001) and extranodal extension (47% vs. 29% and p = 0.046). cALND was associated with higher rates of adjuvant chemotherapy (88% vs. 62% and p = 0.004). Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) was similar between groups (79% vs. 82% and p = 0.68). At a mean follow-up of 5.2 years, there was one chest-wall LRR in the SLNB group, with no axillary recurrences. LRR did not significantly differ with or without cALND (2.9% vs. 1.0% and p = 0.4). Five-year overall survival rates were similar between groups (100% vs. 94% and p = 0.2).
conclusionWe found high OS and low LRR among patients undergoing upfront TM with 1-3 SLN+ without cALND. Completion ALND did not decrease receipt of PMRT but was associated with higher rates of adjuvant chemotherapy. Our findings support the omission of cALND after TM for patients with 1-3 SLN+.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.