ArticleMycopathologia2025
How to Assess Fungal Contamination of Indoor Air in Dwellings of Patients with Cystic Fibrosis?
Article in Mycopathologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic colonization by filamentous fungi in patients with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) is linked to declines in lung function and quality of life. To better assess indoor mold exposure, 23 French dwellings of pwCF from CF care centers in Normandy and Maine & Loire, France were visited. Bioaerosols collected using Coriolis® µ and Coriolis® compact biocollectors and dust were cultured on four different media: Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA), Malt Extract Agar (MEA), Sabouraud Chloramphenicol Gentamicin (SCG) and Sabouraud Chloramphenicol Gentamicin Actidione (S +). A total of 164 fungal species were identified (44 in both air and dust, 77 in air only and 43 in dust only), with no significant difference in average species count between air and dust samples (p = 0.353). The Coriolis® µ biocollector yielded significantly higher species recovery and fungal load from air samples compared to the Coriolis® compact biocollector (p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Higher CFU/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
40619550What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.