ArticleScientific reports2025
Reidentification of hybridization events with transcriptomic data and phylogenomic study in Seabuckthorn.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of QTLs Associated with Stem Breaking Strength and Development of InDel Markers in Soybean Using BSA-Seq.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Distribution response of the diploid hybrid species Hippophae goniocarpa to climate change based on a three-dimensional geographic gradient.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Natural hybridization in sea buckthorn (Hippophae spp.) is well documented. While the parental species involved in these events have been identified, distinctions between F1 hybrids and later-generation (Fn) hybrids remain insufficiently explored, and their genetic compositions are not yet fully understood. In this study, we employed transcriptomic data and reference genomes to identify Fn hybrids in two natural hybrid populations, confirming eight individuals-including H. goniocarpa Lian. X. L. Chen et K. Sun and four members of a hybrid swarm from Qinghai, China-as F1 hybrids. These findings support the hypothesis that H. goniocarpa is not a distinct species, but rather an F1 hybrid within the genus. Additionally, we discuss limitations specific to SNP calling from transcriptomic data-such as allele-specific expression and low transcript abundance-which may lead to the misclassification of heterozygous sites as homozygous. Finally, we constructed the first phylogenomic tree of the Hippophae genus using transcriptomic data and performed a comparative analysis of interspecific relationships based on SNP and indel markers derived from the same dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.