Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40619509›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The influence of civil society's economic status on environmental protection behaviors from the perspective of environmental sociology.

Yifei Zhou, Ying Xiong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yifei ZhouSchool of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. Zhou_YF001@163.com.
Ying XiongSchool of Education, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study utilises 2,741 data points from the 2021 China General Social Survey (CGSS) to explore the intrinsic relationship between socioeconomic status (SES), environmental awareness (EA) and environmental protection behaviours (EPB), as well as their heterogeneous characteristics. The investigation employs linear regression and stepwise regression methods to analyse the data.The study's findings are as follows. Firstly, the study found that SES has a significant positive effect on residents' environmental protection behaviour, and high SES groups are more likely to implement environmental protection behaviours due to the advantages of resource access and environmental education.Secondly, environmental perceptions have been found to play a mediating role, thereby suggesting that economic status can indirectly drive behavioural change by enhancing environmental perceptions. The investigation also reveals significant generational and regional variations, with the environmental behaviour of the elderly being most influenced by SES due to abundant time resources and intergenerational transmission motives. The central region is identified as having the most prominent role of SES in promoting environmental behaviour, owing to the uneven coverage of policies during the transition period of environmental governance.This study aims to provide a reference for other developing countries as they formulate environmental policies, with a view to advancing global green and sustainable development.

Indexed as

And regional differencesEnvironmental behaviourEnvironmental perceptionGenerational differencesSocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID40619509
PMCPMC12230140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.