ArticleScientific reports2025
Investigating social exclusion, affect and emotion regulation in young people using the ostracism online paradigm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- When phones ring in silence: intolerance of uncertainty amplifies the association between being phubbed and online vigilance in face-to-face interaction.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Relationship between psychological resilience and internalizing/externalizing behaviors in adolescents: the mediating role of anhedonia and ostracism.BMC psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social exclusion significantly affects adolescents' well-being. Previous research has indicated that factors such as rejection sensitivity, internalizing disorders and dysfunctional emotion regulation can amplify the emotional impact of ostracism, whereas strategies such as acceptance may alleviate it. This study explores affect changes induced by the Ostracism Online paradigm, and examines the roles of rejection sensitivity, emotion regulation and internalizing symptoms in N = 73 young people (aged 14-21). The participants were randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups to test whether trained acceptance could support recovery from ostracism. As hypothesized, the results revealed worsened positive and negative affect following ostracism. Other than predicted, rejection sensitivity and internalizing symptoms did not significantly influence these changes. Contrary to expectations, acceptance did not facilitate recovery. The time x group interaction did not reach significance after correction, and post hoc tests did not reveal significant differences. As hypothesized, internalizing symptoms were linked to emotion regulation and rejection sensitivity. These findings contribute to understanding the psychological impact of ostracism, emphasizing the importance of considering mental health in future research, along with the study's limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.