Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40619463›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Interpretable machine learning models for survival prediction in prostate cancer bone metastases.

Hua Zhang, Bingtian Dong, Jialin Han, Lewen Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hua ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China. 1028755029@qq.com.
Bingtian DongDepartment of Ultrasound, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Jialin HanDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China.
Lewen HuangDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer bone metastasis (PCBM) is a highly lethal condition with limited survival. Accurate survival prediction is essential for managing these typically incurable patients. However, existing clinical models lack precision. This study seeks to establish machine learning models to improve survival predictions for PCBM patients. We extracted data for PCBM patients from the SEER database spanning 2010 to 2019. Prognostic features were identified through univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. To predict survival outcomes, we developed and validated XGBoost models with five-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and overall accuracy. Feature importance was assessed using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values, while decision curve analysis was conducted to determine the clinical applicability of the models. Additionally, Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis was employed to examine the impact of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy on the survival of PCBM patients. The XGBoost models achieved robust performance in predicting survival for PCBM patients, with AUC values of 0.76, 0.83, and 0.91 for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival predictions, respectively, in the test set. Key prognostic factors included T stage, grade, age, PSA, and Gleason score. Single patients exhibited a significantly higher mortality risk than their married counterparts (HR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.19-1.27, p < 0.001). Conversely, a median household income exceeding $75,000 was associated with a notably reduced mortality risk (HR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.85-0.90, p < 0.001). Univariate Cox analysis showed that surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy were all significantly associated with improved survival. However, multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that only chemotherapy (HR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.81-0.89, p < 0.001) and radiotherapy (HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99, p = 0.032) remained significant, while surgery (HR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.93-1.03, p = 0.387) did not. SHAP summary and force plots were utilized to analyze the XGBoost model both on a global and local scale. Subsequently, a web-based tool was created to streamline the integration of this predictive model into clinical settings. Our study examined the clinical features of patients with PCBM and developed six machine learning models for prognosis, with the XGBoost model demonstrating the highest performance. The model's high accuracy and interpretability provide valuable support for developing personalized treatment plans for PCBM patients.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsMachine LearningProstatic NeoplasmsAgedHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsROC CurveSEER ProgramBone metastasisProstate cancerSEERSurvival predictionXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID40619463
PMCPMC12230155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.