ArticleScientific reports2025
Tocilizumab as a targeted immunomodulatory therapy in the management of severe respiratory illnesses: a multicenter cohort study of COVID-19 patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respiratory pandemics like COVID-19 continued to strain healthcare systems worldwide. Numerous antiviral, antimalarial, and anti-inflammatory treatments were administered to many patients to pursue effective therapeutics. This study aims to assess the efficacy of the anti-inflammatory agent tocilizumab for critically ill patients, specifically in managing respiratory illnesses. This multi-center cohort study included laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 patients as special cases admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs) of 15 hospitals across Saudi Arabia between March 1, 2020, and October 30, 2020. A total of 1470 critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 were included. The study included 1470 patients with a mean age of 55.9 ± 15.1 years; 1088 (74.0%) were male and 382 (26.0%) female. Among them, 29% received Tocilizumab, while 71% received other treatments such as remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, corticosteroids, convalescent plasma, intravenous immunoglobulin, and plasmapheresis. The median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score for the cohort was 5 [IQR 3-8], with lower scores observed in the Tocilizumab administered group (p = 0.143). ICU mortality was significantly lower in the tocilizumab group: 150/426 (35.2%) versus 457/1044 (43.8%), p = 0.004. The median length of ICU stay was longer in the Tocilizumab group (12 days; IQR 7-21) than in the non-Tocilizumab group (8 days; IQR 4-15). However, Tocilizumab use was associated with a reduced likelihood of prolonged ICU stay (adjusted OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.57-0.83; p < 0.001). Similarly, the median hospital stay was longer among Tocilizumab recipients (18 days; IQR 12-30) compared to non-recipients (14 days; IQR 8-23). Despite the longer duration, Tocilizumab was associated with a decreased likelihood of extended hospital stay (adjusted OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.57-0.91; p = 0.003). These findings support the beneficial role of Tocilizumab in managing acute respiratory illness due to COVID-19. This study suggests that tocilizumab, particularly when administered early, is associated with reduced mortality and improved outcomes in critically ill patients. These findings not only support the use of tocilizumab as a therapeutic option for severe cases of COVID-19 but also highlight its potential for future respiratory pandemics. Early intervention with tocilizumab may lead to significant benefits, offering a valuable treatment strategy with manageable adverse effects for critically ill patients in future global health crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.