Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40619407›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2025

Optical coherence tomography for early detection of crop infection.

Ghada Salem Sasi, Stephen J Matcher, Adrien Alexis Paul Chauvet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ghada Salem SasiSchool of Mathematic and Physical Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S3 7HF, UK.
Stephen J MatcherSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Sheffield, 3 Solly Street, Sheffield, S1 4DE, UK.
Adrien Alexis Paul ChauvetSchool of Mathematic and Physical Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S3 7HF, UK. a.chauvet@sheffield.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/X005097/1Natural Environment Research Council NE/X01827X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFungal diseases are among the most significant threats to global crop production, often leading to substantial yield losses. Early detection of crop infection by fungus is the very first step to deploying a timely and effective treatment. Early and reliable detection is thus key to improving yields, sustainability, and achieving food security. Conventional diagnostic methods are however often destructive, slow, or requiring visible symptoms which appear late in the infection process. To overcome these challenges, we propose using optical coherence tomography (OCT) as an innovative imaging tool to provide cross-sectional and three-dimensional images of the plant internal microstructure non-invasively, in vivo, and in real-time.

resultsWe demonstrate the use of low-cost OCT to monitoring wheat (cultivar AxC 169) when infected by Septoria tritici. We show that OCT analysis can effectively detect signs of infection before any external symptoms appear. Although OCT cannot directly visualize fungal hyphae, OCT reveals apparent morphological changes of the mesophyll where the fungal filaments are expected to develop. This study thus focuses on monitoring and correlating changes within the mesophyll structural organisation with the state of infection. It results in distinct statistical difference between intact and infected wheat plants two days only after infection. We then demonstrate the use of machine learning (ML) for high throughput segmentation of OCT scans, providing a foundation for future automated fungus-detection analysis.

conclusionsThis work highlights the potential of OCT, combined with ML tools, to enable rapid, non-invasive, and early diagnosis of crop fungal infections, opening new avenues for precision agriculture and sustainable disease management.

Indexed as

Machine learningOptical coherence tomographySeptoriaWheat

Identifiers

PMID40619407
PMCPMC12232840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.