ArticleStem cell research & therapy2025
Airway epithelial stem cell renewal and differentiation: overcoming challenging steps towards clinical-grade tissue engineering.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Electrolyte-rich saline solutions significantly improve nasal epithelial repair, ciliary beating and epithelial inflammation vs. normal saline.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite their life-saving potential, tissue engineering approaches for the treatment of extensive tracheal and bronchial defects still face significant limitations. A major challenge is the inability to regenerate a functional airway epithelium containing the appropriate amount of stem cells required for long-term tissue renewal following transplantation of the bioengineered graft. In this scenario, extensive cell culture characterization, validation assays and quality controls are needed to guide each step of the regeneration process.
methodsStem cell depletion is often due to suboptimal culture conditions, therefore we tested the ability of a clinical-grade culture system to support the safe and efficient in vitro expansion and differentiation of primary human tracheal and bronchial epithelial cells. Single-cell clonal analysis was used to unravel the heterogeneity of airway basal cells and to understand tissue-specific regeneration and differentiation mechanisms. Functional assays were used to investigate the wound healing ability and tightness of the regenerated epithelium under the selected culture conditions.
resultsPrimary tracheobronchial epithelial cells showed an impressive proliferative potential, allowing the regeneration of a mature and functional epithelium without immortalisation events. Analysis at the single cell level allowed the identification of the subpopulation of basal cells endowed with in vitro self-renewal, distinguishing them from transient amplifying cells. This approach has further defined the hierarchy of cellular differentiation and its correlation with regenerative and differentiation potential.
conclusionsOur results show that primary airway epithelial cell cultures can maintain stem cells together with their differentiation lineages in vitro. Airway cells can be safely and effectively used in autologous tissue engineering approaches when cultured under appropriate and well-standardised conditions. In addition to the validation assays proposed for the development of new advanced therapy products, this study outlines possible quality controls to enhance therapeutic success and maximise patient safety in future clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.