ReviewScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025
Blood transfusion - moving from what to how.
Review in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rising burden of subarachnoid hemorrhage linked to high systolic blood pressure among young and middle-aged populations: temporal trends and global implication.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pre-hospital blood transfusion has become standard practice in the management of major trauma in the UK, with all 21 UK air ambulance services now carrying blood products. While extensive research has focused on what blood components to give, there remains a notable gap in evidence regarding how transfusion should be administered, particularly with respect to physiological targets like blood pressure and heart rate. Current transfusion strategies are informed by guidelines such as the European and NICE UK guidelines and through courses such as Advanced Trauma Life Support and the European Trauma Courses. These strategies broadly suggest transfusion triggers and targets based on blood pressure and clinical judgement. Current guidelines are based on studies mostly involving fluid-not blood-resuscitation, and acknowledge that existing evidence is limited. Evidence regarding the haemodynamic response to pre-hospital blood transfusion remains sparse. Importantly, there is no strong evidence confirming a linear relationship between transfusion and vital sign improvement, with most existing research on blood product transfusion focusing on ratios and types of product transfused rather than real-time physiological responses to transfusion. Given the complexity and lack of heterogeneity amongst trauma patients clinical decision-making for transfusion is complicated. There are a number of other factors that may cause or contribute to hypotension in trauma in the absence of blood loss; these include Vaso-active head injuries, inflammatory responses and cardiac and endothelial dysfunction. Additional factors such as age, comorbidities, medications, injury mechanism, and frailty influence haemodynamic responses to both trauma and transfusion. In conclusion, while pre-hospital blood transfusion is a critical intervention, understanding its immediate physiological effect on the complex trauma patient remains limited. Future research should explore the haemodynamic response from trauma patients during the immediate transfusion period, reviewing triggers for transfusion and haemodynamic transfusion targets, to ascertain whether there is a linear, predictable physiological response to transfusion resuscitation in the pre-hospital setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.