ArticleBMC medical education2025
Innovations in neurosurgical education: the role of neurosurgical labs at neuroscience hospital of Baghdad in enhancing surgical skills.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe field of neurosurgical education has seen significant advancements in recent years. However, the distribution of advanced neurosurgical education remains uneven, particularly in developing countries like Iraq. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the neurosurgical lab at Neuroscience Hospital in Baghdad, focusing on its impact on surgical precision, skill and acquisition among neurosurgery residents.
methodA cross-sectional survey targeted neurosurgeons, neurosurgical residents, and medical students actively utilizing the lab. The survey assessed the frequency of lab use, the impact of lab resources on clinical practice, and skill development. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests to explore associations between variables such as lab usage frequency, satisfaction, and professional development.
resultsForty participants responded to the questionnaire. The results revealed that 60% of the participants expressed high satisfaction. The microscope and training models were considered highly impactful, with 80% of participants rating these resources as 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale. The chi-square tests revealed a statistically significant relationship between lab use frequency and satisfaction (χ² = 11.4, p = 0.010).
conclusionThe neurosurgical lab at Neuroscience Hospital has proven to be an essential resource for enhancing surgical skills and promoting innovation. The findings highlight the need for continued integration of advanced technologies like 3D printing to improve neurosurgical training and outcomes in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.