Observational studyBMC medical education2025
Survey of medical student attitudes regarding uterine transplant for cisgender and transgender women: an observational study.
Observational study in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study wishes to survey medical students' attitudes regarding legality of, funding for, and conscientious objection to uterine transplant (UTx) in cisgender and transgender women.
methodsMedical students were invited to complete an online anonymous survey from March 18, 2024 to April 1, 2024. Baseline demographics collected, and four-point Likert scales were used on four pairs of questions to evaluate attitudes regarding UTx for cisgender and transgender women. Subject responses to paired questions were analyzed using Fisher's Exact Test. Strength of correlation between the paired questions were analyzed with Spearman's Correlation.
resultsA total of 96 responses were collected and 66 responses answering at least one of questions 5 to 8 were included in the final dataset. Nineteen (29%) self-identified as male and forty-three (65%) as female. A majority of respondents (72%) believed that a clinician should be able to object conscientiously to UTx regardless of gender identity, but only 14% would personally object to any UTx. A minority of respondents (10%) would object only to UTx for transgender women. Overall, female respondents (Correlation Coefficient average = 0.939) were more likely to select the same answer to paired questions regardless of gender identity compared to their male counterparts (Correlation Coefficient average = 0.558).
conclusionsThis study shows some division among medical students regarding their attitudes toward UTx for cisgender and transgender women. For medical students willing to participate in UTx for cisgender but not transgender patients, additional ethical analysis is needed to determine whether these attitudes constitute invidious discrimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.