ReviewJournal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis2025
The Role of Polygenic Risk Score in the General Population: Current Status and Future Prospects.
Review in Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic and lifestyle determinants of lipid profiles in Japanese young adults: evidence from MBOAT7 rs641738.Lipids in health and disease · 2026Article
- Precision nutrition in weight loss and neuroendocrine control of people with obesity: The study protocol of a factorial randomised controlled trial (GenON Programme).Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Predictive Biomarkers for Asymptomatic Adults: Opportunities, Risks, and Guidance for General Practice.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRSs), constructed from numerous common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), have emerged as useful tools for predicting future atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). PRSs have shown independent associations with ASCVD outcomes and are increasingly being considered to enhance risk stratification and guide primary prevention strategies. However, most evidence to date has been derived from populations of European ancestry, and their generalizability to other populations, including East Asians, remains uncertain. This review summarizes the current epidemiological evidence on the association between PRS and ASCVD outcomes, focusing on findings in Japanese cohorts. We discuss the potential of PRS as a clinical decision support tool, its incremental value over traditional risk factors, and its role in the early identification of high-risk individuals. We also highlight the limited number of prospective studies in the Japanese population, where validation and implementation studies are ongoing. Given the growing accessibility of genetic testing and the potential of PRS to complement conventional risk assessments, further large-scale studies are warranted to evaluate its clinical utility across diverse populations. Expanding ancestry-specific biobanks and improving PRS transferability are essential steps toward the equitable implementation of genomic risk prediction in ASCVD prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.