ArticleSexually transmitted infections2025
Estimating the number of people who could benefit from HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in England and the unmet need.
Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo quantify how many people in England could benefit from using pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV acquisition (PrEP need), and of these, the number who did not access PrEP (unmet need) by population group and ethnicity.
methodsAn established multiplier method was applied using published data from a behavioural survey of gay, bisexual and men who have sex with men (GBMSM) and national data on UK-acquired new HIV diagnoses categorised by ethnicity and probable HIV exposure route.After calculating the number of GBMSM who could benefit from PrEP, the number of people in other groups who could benefit from PrEP was calculated using the relative proportion of new HIV diagnoses within each group. The proportion of new HIV diagnoses by ethnicity was then used to calculate the number of people who could benefit from PrEP by ethnicity.Within each subgroup (population group and ethnicity), the number with unmet need for PrEP was calculated by subtracting those who accessed PrEP at a specialist sexual health service (SHS) from the estimated number who could benefit from PrEP.
resultsIn 2023, there were an estimated 485 335 people who could benefit from PrEP in England, 80.1% (n=388 773) of whom did not access PrEP from an SHS-and of these, 94.5% (n=367 444) did not attend an SHS. There were 129 359 heterosexual women with unmet PrEP need, 93 049 GBMSM and 88 204 heterosexual men. There were three ethnicities for which >85% of people with PrEP need did not access PrEP: Black African (98.6%), Black other (96.3%) and Black Caribbean (85.4%).
conclusionsThe findings indicate a considerable unmet need for PrEP in England. Most people with unmet need did not attend an SHS, highlighting an urgent need to raise awareness of the benefits of PrEP and expand PrEP access to additional settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.