ReviewLancet (London, England)2025
A decade later, what have we learned from the Zika epidemic in children with intrauterine exposure?
Review in Lancet (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cellular receptors and host factors mediating orthoflavivirus entry.Virology journal · 2026Review
- Zika Virus Inoculation During Pregnancy Impaired Maternal Care and Altered Prolactin and Corticosterone Levels in Rats.Developmental neurobiology · 2026Article
- Mutations in the NS5 RdRp Domain of Zika and Dengue Viruses: Insights into Molecular Patterns in Inland Midwestern Brazil.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Article
- An allosteric inhibitor of the Zika virus NS2B-NS3 protease with oral efficacy in mouse models.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Zika virus infection in early pregnancy increases the likelihood of persistent neutralizing antibodies.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- COVID-19 emergency cash transfer and pregnancy in Brazil.Demographic researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since the emergence of the Zika virus epidemic in 2014 and the associated novel sequalae that emerged, much has been learned about the effects of antenatal exposure to Zika virus. Zika virus in pregnancy carries severe teratogenic potential to the fetus, ranging from congenital Zika syndrome to milder neurodevelopmental sequelae. Congenital Zika syndrome is associated with a spectrum of alterations that can affect cognitive, language, and motor development. Among children with congenital Zika syndrome, dysphagia and seizures are common, as are hospitalisations for pneumonia and urinary tract infections; overall, morbidity and mortality are extremely high. Children without congenital Zika syndrome but exposed to Zika virus antenatally are also at risk of developmental disorders. In addition, in utero exposure to Zika virus does not lead to the production of neutralising antibodies. Although the epidemic has subsided, Zika virus remains endemic in many countries and continues to affect families. Maternal associations have been fundamental in advocating for health care for children with congenital Zika syndrome and economic support for families. Gaps in scientific knowledge include the absence of data on long-term outcomes among school-age children. Future research and investments are needed to improve diagnostics, restart the stalled development of Zika virus vaccines, and evaluate antiviral treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.