Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40618757›Full record

Observational studyEndoscopy2026

Two-sample fecal immunochemical testing as a tool to avert colonoscopy in symptomatic patients: a prospective multicenter cohort study.

Sarah Moen, Pieter H A Wisse, Fleur Marijnissen, Hannah Raab, Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Jeroen M Jansen, Merel M Tielemans, I Leeuwenburgh, Leonieke M M Wolters, Lieke Hol and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Sarah Moen *Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Pieter H A Wisse *Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Fleur MarijnissenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Hannah RaabDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Iris Lansdorp-VogelaarDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Jeroen M JansenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, PoliDirect Independent Treatment Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Merel M TielemansDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands.
I LeeuwenburghDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Leonieke M M WoltersDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Lieke HolDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Pieter C J Ter BorgDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Frank C BekkeringDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, DC Clinics Independent Treatment Centers, Capelle aan den IJssel, Netherlands.
Sanna MulderDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, Netherlands.
Ingrid SchotDepartment of Gastroenterology and hepatology, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, Netherlands.
Marieke FrasaDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands.
Marc ThelenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Anneke J van VuurenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Manon C W SpaanderDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9103-9757

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In most colonoscopies performed for bowel symptoms, no significant lesions are found. To decrease the number of unnecessary colonoscopies, we evaluated the performance of two-sample fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) in ruling out significant lesions. Methods: Symptomatic patients referred for colonoscopy were instructed to perform two FITs from separate bowel movements prior to colonoscopy. Colonoscopy and pathology data were collected. Two-sample FIT was considered positive when FIT1 and/or FIT2 results were positive. Sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) for advanced neoplasia, advanced serrated polyps, and colitis were determined at different cutoff values. Results: 949 patients (median age 61 years, 50.6% male) from 10 centers were included. The highest NPVs and sensitivities were reached with two-sample FIT using the lowest limit of fecal hemoglobin detection (>1.7 µg Hb/g). For advanced neoplasia and CRC, this resulted in NPVs of 95.6% and 99.7%, and sensitivities of 71.7% and 93.9%, respectively. Sensitivity for advanced neoplasia was higher (84.6%) in patients with the alarm symptoms of rectal blood loss and/or anemia. NPV and sensitivity for inflammatory bowel disease were 99.3% and 83.3%, respectively. Concordant negative results were found for 675 patients (71.1%). Conclusions: Despite a high NPV, two-sample FIT still missed 28.3% of advanced neoplasia. Therefore, two-sample FIT may play a role in determining the need for colonoscopy in symptomatic patients, but it misses too many lesions to be used as the sole determinant for averting colonoscopy.

Indexed as

Colonic PolypsColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsFecesOccult BloodAdultAgedColitisEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHemoglobinsHumansImmunochemistryInflammatory Bowel DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedHemoglobins

Identifiers

PMID40618757
PMCPMC12829320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.