Observational studyEndoscopy2026
Two-sample fecal immunochemical testing as a tool to avert colonoscopy in symptomatic patients: a prospective multicenter cohort study.
Observational study in Endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In most colonoscopies performed for bowel symptoms, no significant lesions are found. To decrease the number of unnecessary colonoscopies, we evaluated the performance of two-sample fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) in ruling out significant lesions. Methods: Symptomatic patients referred for colonoscopy were instructed to perform two FITs from separate bowel movements prior to colonoscopy. Colonoscopy and pathology data were collected. Two-sample FIT was considered positive when FIT1 and/or FIT2 results were positive. Sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) for advanced neoplasia, advanced serrated polyps, and colitis were determined at different cutoff values. Results: 949 patients (median age 61 years, 50.6% male) from 10 centers were included. The highest NPVs and sensitivities were reached with two-sample FIT using the lowest limit of fecal hemoglobin detection (>1.7 µg Hb/g). For advanced neoplasia and CRC, this resulted in NPVs of 95.6% and 99.7%, and sensitivities of 71.7% and 93.9%, respectively. Sensitivity for advanced neoplasia was higher (84.6%) in patients with the alarm symptoms of rectal blood loss and/or anemia. NPV and sensitivity for inflammatory bowel disease were 99.3% and 83.3%, respectively. Concordant negative results were found for 675 patients (71.1%). Conclusions: Despite a high NPV, two-sample FIT still missed 28.3% of advanced neoplasia. Therefore, two-sample FIT may play a role in determining the need for colonoscopy in symptomatic patients, but it misses too many lesions to be used as the sole determinant for averting colonoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.